Skip to content

USAA Wins $4.3M in Patent Infringement Case, Far Less Than Expected

USAA secures damages in patent trial, but amount is a fraction of what was sought. The case underscores the uncertainties in patent infringement litigation.

In this picture I can see there is a smartphone and there are few specifications mentioned on the...
In this picture I can see there is a smartphone and there are few specifications mentioned on the screen and it is placed in a white box and placed on a brown surface.

USAA Wins $4.3M in Patent Infringement Case, Far Less Than Expected

In a significant turn of events, a jury in Marshall, Texas has awarded USAA a mere $4.3 million in damages for patent infringement related to mobile check deposit technology. This decision marks a stark contrast to previous trials in the same district, where USAA secured damages totaling $200 million, $102 million, and $218.45 million.

The jury found that PNC Bank, the defendant in this case, had indeed infringed upon USAA's patents. However, unlike the previous three trials, the jury did not deem the infringement to be willful. This distinction significantly reduced the awarded damages, which USAA had initially claimed to be $80.5 million.

The law firm Gillam & Smith, known for their expertise in patent litigation and intellectual property protection, served as USAA's legal counsel throughout the trial. Despite the substantial reduction in damages, this trial underscores the ongoing legal battles surrounding mobile banking technology patents.

The jury's decision in the USAA vs. PNC Bank case highlights the complexities and uncertainties of patent infringement litigation. While USAA secured a damage award, the amount is a fraction of what they had sought, demonstrating the challenges faced by patent holders in proving willful infringement. This trial, the fourth of its kind in Marshall, Texas, serves as a reminder of the intricate nature of intellectual property disputes in the tech industry.

Read also:

Latest