Unbeknownst to many, certain perks could escalate up to a staggering $80,000.
Flickering Data in Long-Term Rental Orders: A Tale of Two Segments and a Fringe Benefit Rule
A puzzling scenario unfolds in the first two months of long-term rental agreements, leaving many baffled. Operators paint a grim picture, citing plunging orders and requests to postpone deliveries due to a decrease in fleet manager requests. Yet, the stats tell a contradictory tale. Long-term rental (LTR) registrations in January/February of the year 2024 miraculously remained the same as the previous year, at 60,000 units.
However, ducking beneath the surface of these averages reveals some intriguing discrepancies. Independent leasing companies registered merely 31,000 cars over the period, marking a stunning 30% drop compared to the figures of 2024. On the flip side, captive lessors, linked to automotive groups, registered the missing 13,000 units, jumping from 16,000 to 29,000, a breathtaking 81% increase from the previous year.
Is it simply two contrasting clienteles at play? Absolutely. But does that explanation suffice? Not even close. It's far more likely that leasing companies are simply echoing the preferences of their customers, who, faced with the prospect of their paychecks taking a nosedive due to new tax legislation, are keen to delay their vehicle purchases while those associated with automotive groups prioritize lower emission vehicle registrations to meet legislative directives.
Intriguingly, long-term rentals, not just these, registered a staggering 50% surge in plug-in hybrids and a 150% jump in full electric vehicles during the same period. As the captive companies continue to act as a buffer between manufacturers' demands and customer preferences, we ponder how long they can sustain this role.
** worth a read**
Extensions have occurred before due to product unavailability or problems related to used vehicle value, but this time is different. A slowdown in demand and the impact of the tightening of the fringe benefit rule are probable reasons. The taxation rule penalizes vehicle owners registering cars from the year 2025, leading to extensions of existing rentals or leases. A survey of over 200 industry experts commissioned by AgitaLab, a think tank, predicts that around 80,000 fewer registrations could result, a figure deemed realistic by two-thirds of the panel.
While the consensus regarding the rule's appropriateness remains divided, fleet managers and drivers today grapple with making informed decisions about the vehicles they should order. Conversations with them, along with leasing companies, demonstrate widespread dissatisfaction with plug-in hybrid vehicles, as the electric motor's usage is insignificant compared to the internal combustion engine. The limited fuel tank space, which forces frequent refueling stops, and the batteries' added weight, leading to higher consumption, are further constraints.
Some are contemplating choosing plug-in hybrids but opting for diesel engines, which offer lower consumption and cost. However, others clamor for a return to reliable diesel engines, provided that they secure approval. Ironically, this delight precedes the new tax deductions' implementation.
In the context of the text, it can be inferred that the technical industry of automotive leasing is impacted by a combination of factors in the finance sector, namely changes in business demands due to new tax legislation and the implementation of the fringe benefit rule.
The pace and directions of vehicle registrations differ significantly between independent leasing companies and captive lessors in the long-term rental (LTR) segment, possibly due to the preferences of their clientele and the impact of the fringe benefit rule.
