Self is the one who bears the burden of taxes, not others.
In a series of escalating tariff disputes, the economic impact of President Donald Trump's trade policies has become a topic of intense debate. A recent analysis suggests that ultimately, American consumers and households pay for the tariffs imposed by Trump.
When goods enter the U.S., tariffs are nominally charged on importers. However, the economic burden of these tariffs often falls on U.S. consumers through higher prices on imported goods and their domestic substitutes. This is evidenced by the continued absorption of tariffs by retail giants like Walmart, which implies that the tariffs are being passed along the domestic supply chain to some extent.
Importers in the U.S. generally respond by paying the tariffs assessed by Customs and Border Protection. This compels importers to carefully manage tariff liquidation and possible recourse actions depending on court outcomes. In contrast, if foreign manufacturers were absorbing the costs, U.S. import prices should decrease, but they are not.
In the European Union and other affected economies, importers and governments typically respond through retaliatory tariffs and trade countermeasures. For example, the EU retaliated by reinstating or increasing tariffs on $28 billion of U.S. exports, including whiskey, with rates as high as 50% on some products. This tit-for-tat escalation raises costs for U.S. exporters, dampens export growth, and triggers broader economic effects such as reduced GDP growth and higher inflation globally.
So, while importers appear to pay the tariffs on paper, the ultimate economic burden is borne by consumers and downstream businesses in the U.S. Importers and exporters in both the U.S. and EU face higher transaction costs and uncertainty, which can reduce trade volumes and investment.
In a statement on his Truth Social network, Trump expressed his expectation of some cost increases due to his tariffs. In response to Doug McMillon, CEO of Walmart, stating that the company would be unable to absorb all the pressure from the tariffs, implying that higher tariffs would lead to higher prices, Trump ordered Walmart to "swallow the tariffs".
The tariff spat between Trump and the EU is escalating, with Trump remaining consistent in his stance on tariffs, stating that there might be some pain but it would be worth it to make America great again. However, the impact of these tariffs on American consumers and businesses is a concern that continues to grow.
[1] [Source] [2] [Source] [3] [Source] [4] [Source] [5] [Source]
The Commission has also been asked to submit a proposal for a directive on the finance business, aiming to address the increased costs borne by American consumers and downstream businesses due to tariffs. This directive could potentially provide relief by adjusting import taxes and promoting more competitive pricing in the finance sector.
In the midst of the escalating tariff dispute, American importers and businesses may increasingly face financial strain, prompting the need for government intervention and policy adjustments to mitigate this pressure.
