Skip to content

Rewe-Pen poses a potential threat to the business location, alerting the Managing Director.

Critics in the industry denounce the Supreme Court's decision against Rewe, with constitutional legal experts also expressing concerns about potential unfavorable repercussions.

Court Decision Draws Criticism From Market Figures Over Adversity Faced by Rewe; Legal Experts...
Court Decision Draws Criticism From Market Figures Over Adversity Faced by Rewe; Legal Experts Apprehend Potential Adverse Implications

Rewe-Pen poses a potential threat to the business location, alerting the Managing Director.

Criticism Mounts Over Record €70 Million Fine Levied Against Rewe Group

A debate persists over the highest cartel fine in history, imposed on the Rewe Group in February, with Rainer Trefelik, head of trade at the Economic Chamber (WKÖ), adding his voice to the criticism. Rewe Group, owner of retail chains such as Adeg, Billa, Bipa, and Penny, was fined €70 million for failing to notify the Federal Competition Authority (BWB) before taking over another food retailer's sales area.

Trefelik questions the constitutionality of the Supreme Court (OGH) decision on the matter, expressing concern that it could potentially harm the economic location of Austria in the long term. He notes that a large corporation like Rewe, a significant employer with a crucial role in the country's food supply, may struggle to shoulder such a financial burden.

The ruling has sparked confusion within the legal community, with many, including constitutional law expert Christian Piska from the University of Vienna, criticizing the use of the parent company's global turnover to determine the fine for a case with purely regional significance. Similar ruling trends at the European level have left the case seemingly incomparable.

Legal policy expert Maria Mercedes Ritschl from the Association of Industrialists shares similar sentiments, arguing that fines of such magnitude are typically imposed in cases of deliberate, long-term price-fixing agreements, a scale not applicable to Rewe's offense.

The unexpected decision and the resulting uncertainty in the business environment appear to present a significant challenge for businesses seeking legal certainty and long-term planning, according to Ritschl.

Despite having exhausted its domestic legal recourses, Rewe plans to appeal the OGH decision to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The process could take several years before a decision is reached.

In this case, the BWB chief Natalie Harsdorf defended the penalty against Rewe, citing the company's four-year delay in reporting the merger and its previous violation of similar nature.

Background information suggests that the European Single Market's principles, including the free movement of goods and services, play a crucial role in shaping business environments across member states. Any legal or economic challenges faced by companies like Rewe would need to be addressed within this framework.

The United States political and business communities are closely watching the controversy surrounding the €70 million fine imposed on the Rewe Group, given its similarities to cases involving M&A regulations and antitrust violations. The unprecedented fine, coupled with the constitutionality concerns raised by critics, could sets a significant precedent in global finance and politics, potentially affecting the general-news landscape.

Read also:

    Latest