Opinion Piece: Examination of Controversial Matters and Current Events
** Do Trump's Plans Pose a Menace to the Global Financial System? Let's Break it Down**
The White House, under Trump's leadership, is gunning for a wrecking ball to the global regulatory blueprint. Can it weather this storm?
Opinion Piece by Andreas Dombret and Marc Uzan
Thursday, April 3, 2025, 3:08 AM
Want to read the full article? You might be among the lucky ones who can grab a corporate subscription. Follow the link below to check your eligibility in a flash.
Check Eligibility | Learn More | Already a Subscriber? Sign in
Key Insights:
- Environmental Deregulation and Financial Risks: Trump's aggressive approach towards rolling back climate protections and fast-tracking energy innovation leads to stranded fossil fuel investments and less green energy financing. This contradicts the $4-6 trillion annual investments needed between now and 2050 for decarbonization[2]. Legal disputes may introduce policy uncertainty, potentially impacting energy sector valuations long-term.
- Fiscal Policy Backlash: Proposed corporate tax cuts and extended TCJA financing via deficit spending could destabilize US debt dynamics, leading to currency volatility, policy contagion among competing nations, and heightened sovereign risk if deficit-to-GDP ratios surpass 100%.
- Erosion of Regulatory Standards: The administration's preference for executive orders over regular regulatory processes jeopardizes the Administrative Procedure Act's standing in giving U.S. regulatory credibility. This compromises international cooperation (e.g., Basel III, Paris Agreement), encourages regulatory arbitrage, and hikes compliance costs for multinationals.
- Threats to Global Regulatory Architecture: Although intact, the architecture faces erosion as a result of:
- Fragmentation of climate finance regulations
- Constraints on multilateral stimulus coordination
- Reduced trust in the U.S. as a regulatory standard-bearer due to procedural violations
Legal experts anticipate ongoing court battles over procedural breaches, adding a layer of market uncertainty that relies on U.S. regulatory predictability. The confluence of climate policy reversals and fiscal expansion without revenue offsets risks triggering synchronous shocks to both physical and financial systems globally. However, the architecture's survival depends on whether other significant economies keep their climate-minded financial regulations and work together to isolate U.S.-specific regulatory risks.
- The erosion of United States regulatory standards, as seen in Trump's administration's preference for executive orders, contradicts the international cooperation required to maintain the global regulatory architecture, such as in agreements like Basel III and the Paris Agreement.
- Under Trump's leadership, the reform of environmental regulations, which rolls back climate protections and promotes energy innovation, could result in financial risks. Stranded fossil fuel investments and less green energy financing may contradict the necessary investments for decarbonization by 2050, introducing policy uncertainty that could impact energy sector valuations and the financial system.
- With Trump's proposed corporate tax cuts and extended TCJA financing via deficit spending, the United States may face instability in its debt dynamics, leading to currency volatility, policy contagion among competing nations, and heightened sovereign risk if deficit-to-GDP ratios surpass 100%. This financial instability could prove challenging for businesses to survive in the global market by 2025.
