Grey Belt's Policy Lacking Behind Its Catchy Slogan

Grey Belt's Policy Lacking Behind Its Catchy Slogan

In recent years, the amount of land in England designated as Green Belt has seen a modest increase of around 1.7% for two consecutive years (2021-22 and 2022-23), now covering 1,638,420 hectares, or 12.6% of England's land mass. This expansion, however, is not enough to meet the new government's ambitious housing targets, which aim to deliver 1.5 million homes this Parliament.

To address this challenge, a fundamental review of the Green Belt is suggested as a key part of the solution. Recognising that not all Green Belt land is equal, some areas that do not meet the Green Belt's original purposes may need to be released and made available for development. This approach is reflected in the introduction of the Grey Belt policy, a significant change in Green Belt policy in recent decades.

The Grey Belt policy, formally introduced in planning guidance, creates a two-tier system. While traditional Green Belt land benefits from a strong presumption against development, Grey Belt land can be developed if four cumulative tests are passed. This policy shift allows developments on Grey Belt sites, which are identified as land that does limited work to prevent sprawl or merging of towns, includes substantial existing built development, is enclosed by urban land uses, and does not protect historic settings or ecological designations.

The Grey Belt policy, incorporated in the 2024 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), has begun to boost housing approvals, with some councils escaping planning "special measures." However, the impact is regionally uneven, with areas like the North East of England experiencing limited short-term impact due to already meeting housing land supply requirements and delivery tests.

The Grey Belt policy represents an attempt to balance the housing crisis with environmental and planning objectives by unlocking development potential on less sensitive Green Belt areas. It allows more development in rural and peri-urban areas while preserving the essential functions of the Green Belt. Yet, substantial assessments and safeguards remain to prevent merging of settlements and protect critical landscapes.

While the Grey Belt policy is active and facilitates increased housing development on designated lower-value Green Belt land by easing planning restrictions, it retains protections for the most valuable Green Belt areas. This nuanced evolution of Green Belt protection in the UK is seen as a necessary step towards addressing the housing crisis while maintaining environmental and planning objectives.

In a recent development, Labour leader Keir Starmer has accepted that the Green Belt must be reviewed to address the housing crisis. However, he emphasises the need for a strategic approach that considers expanding the Green Belt overall while delivering more homes. Repurposing smaller individual sites, such as car parks, petrol stations, and quarries, could increase their aesthetic value while contributing to the housing supply.

In conclusion, the Grey Belt policy is a significant step towards addressing England's housing crisis while maintaining the essential functions of the Green Belt. It is important to note that this policy is part of a wider strategy to bolster housing supply and not the only means of doing so. As the review of the Green Belt continues, striking a balance between housing needs and environmental protection will remain a key challenge.

1. The ambitious housing targets set by the new government require a fundamental review of the Green Belt, as the current expansion is not sufficient to meet the goal of delivering 1.5 million homes.
2. To address the housing crisis, the introduction of the Grey Belt policy has been proposed as a key part of the solution, which creates a two-tier system to allow development on less sensitive Green Belt areas.
3. The Grey Belt policy, incorporated in the 2024 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), allows more development in rural and peri-urban areas while preserving the essential functions of the Green Belt.
4. In recent news, Labour leader Keir Starmer has accepted the need to review the Green Belt but has emphasized the importance of a strategic approach that considers both expanding the Green Belt and delivering more homes.
5. To maintain environmental protection and address the housing crisis, considerations should be given to repurposing smaller individual sites, such as car parks, petrol stations, and quarries, which could increase their aesthetic value while contributing to the housing supply.
6. The hosting crisis, climate-change, environmental-science, finance, investing, real-estate, policy-and-legislation, politics, and general-news are all interconnected, and striking a balance between housing needs and environmental protection will remain a key challenge for policy and legislation moving forward.

Read also: